For a while now the judiciary’s dashboard has been flashing redlights non-stop.
Nobody would have missed it. But then it would seem like the judiciary itself has not been as vigilant.
If they had paid any slightest attention, the judiciary would not have missed a growing groundswell of public opinion which holds that far from being a detached and disinterested arbiters of the ongoing tussle between president Mokgweetsi Masisi and his predecessor Ian Khama, they are actually active participants – involved knee-deep and with a vested interest on the outcome.
There's more to this story
But to keep reading, we need you to subscribe.
Investigative journalism is an indispensable part of a healthy society, but it's also expensive to produce. We are reliant on subscriptions to fund our work, and while you can enjoy most of our stories for free, a small number of premium features are reserved for subscribers.
You can subscribe for one week, a month or a full year - the choice is yours.
Save 77% on an annual subscription. Click here to find out how.
Existing subscribers can log in to keep reading here.
