Sunday, March 3, 2024

BFTU supports BONELA’s stance against mandatory vaccination

The Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS’s (BONELA) stance that mandatory vaccination is an infringement of human rights has gathered support from the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions.

In the statement, BONELA said, notwithstanding the documented benefits of Covid-19 vaccines, they posit that these vaccines should not be made mandatory in any situation including in the workplace.

“Making vaccines mandatory is an infringement on human rights, primarily the right to personal liberty and freedom from discrimination. Vaccine mandates to a very large extent violate the rights of people who object to being vaccinated for religious and medical reasons. Furthermore, mandatory vaccination in the workplace has the potential to breed discrimination on people who opt not to be vaccinated,” the statement read.

The Ministry of Health and Wellness’s (MOHW) position is that people should voluntarily get vaccinated. Chief public relations officer Christopher Nyanga said no decision has been taken to force people to get vaccinated for Covid-19. “What the ministry is doing is an aggressive public education and sensitisation campaign for people to get vaccinated given the known benefits of vaccination. As of now, we are satisfied with the numbers of people turning up for vaccination,” Nyanga said. 

Secretary-General of the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU), Thusang Butale, shares the position of the BONELA. 

“We hold that whilst scientific research has confirmed the benefits of vaccination both to the individual and those around them, it remains the choice of the individual to decide whether their conscience, religion or conviction and even extent of awareness about its safety, allows them to take the vaccine,” Butale said. 

The union furthers posits that expediting the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines for those who are ready to take it would be the best thing to do in order to enhance herd immunity which from a scientific point of view would represent another effective way of tackling the pandemic.

“BFTU submits that at the workplace, the issue of vaccination should not be the prerogative of government or employers alone rather it presents an opportunity for parties to dialogue and come up with comprehensive policies to address any attendant concerns including discrimination which could result from the choices the individuals would have made,” said Butale.

On the national plane, BFTU believes the government should consider ratifying relevant human and labour rights conventions including convention 190 which speaks to the problem of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.

The United States (US) president, Joe Biden, decided to introduce a vaccine mandate for millions of workers. The new US rules require most federal employees to be vaccinated as well as employees of companies larger than 100 employees who will either have to be vaccinated or face mandatory testing.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has said before that in the absence of a sufficient, reliable vaccine supply that would permit every eligible member of the general public to be vaccinated, a mandate for the general public would fail to address ethical considerations regarding sufficient supply. According to the WHO even if there is a sufficient, reliable vaccine supply, policymakers should consider whether mandatory vaccination of the general population is necessary and proportionate to achieve intended public health goals.


Read this week's paper