It is 2032 and Botswana, in common with the world, has seen momentous changes. Never mind who has won the 2014 and subsequent elections, for national polls have become meaningless. State House, parliament, cabinet and the government enclave have long ceased to be the seats of power.
In this new order, the levers of power are now held by a super-class, which the media calls the ‘globocrats’. This elite group comprises the world’s most influential power brokers. They are the ones now calling the shots across the world, effectively controlling the globe.
The Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) and its political rivals have become irrelevant. Countries like Botswana have become mere units of governance in the global arena. The African Union, SADC and other regional groupings have been consigned to the dustbins of history. State presidents, screened and carefully selected by this elite group, are now powerless, reduced to mere pawns.
Welcome to the future, seen through the misty eyes of those, who for years, have been sounding alarm about the prospect of a centralized global government controlled by an elite group.
With one crisis after another tearing across the world today, fears are mounting that the elite, powered by the world’s most influential banking families, are hard at work, scheming to accelerate the effort to bring the world under a central government. This push for one government is now being called the “open conspiracy”.
In January this year, the Economist, one of the world’s most influential publications, wrote of how “the cosmopolitan elite” are flocking together to shape the world that the “super-class” wish to live in. The newspaper described it as “an evil conspiracy bent on world domination”.
The Economist gives examples of major international events that have over the years been influenced at these elite gatherings. These include major diplomatic agreements and even decisions on major wars.
These gatherings have effectively become clubs formed by the cosmopolitan elite ÔÇô comprising international financiers, bureaucrats, charity bosses and notable thinkers. The most influential of these clubs, says the Economist, are the Bilderberg, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Group of Thirty.
International watchers like Wikileaks’ Julian Assange say the agenda of these groups is to shape the policies of politicians and power brokers who they have effectively “bought”.
For example, Bilderberg, which hosts the world’s most influential aristocrats, business people and a cadre of journalists representing the biggest global media organisations, is said to be the force behind the reality of a single European currency.
While admitting that international bankers carried a wholesale looting of the system when the financial crisis broke, the Economist insists the globocrats should not be blamed for the crisis itself. Like the rest of the world, they too were caught with their pants down.
But, according to Assange, reports from Bilderberg meetings in Canada in 2006 and in Turkey in 2007 predicted a global housing crisis and forecast a prolonged financial meltdown as a result. In other words, they foresaw it. Since then, says Assange, the group has been debating exactly how it should shape the economic situation in order to further its own global influence and that of its “super-class”.
Assange and analysts like Richard Moore, a regular contributor to Global Research, agree that the movement toward a centralized order, or new world order, has been long in the making.
Its major proponents are some of the world’s most influential bankers. In a statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994, David Rockefeller said, “We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order.”
Rockefeller, patriarch of the all-powerful Rockefeller banking family, is a member of Bilderberg, The Council on Foreign Relations, and The Trilateral Commission. Three years earlier in 1991, he made a more significant statement. “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years but the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of authority.”
Over the years, world leaders have echoed the clarion call for a new order. Mikhail Gorbachev was the first world leader to come out publicly with talk of a “new world order”, two years before George Bush caught the bug.
In a historic address to the United Nations in 1988, the then Soviet Prime Minister said: “Further global progress is now only possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.”
Just before leaving for Helsinki, Finland, in early September 1990 to discuss the Persian Gulf Crisis at his summit with Gorbachev, Bush expressed hope that “the foundation for the new world order would be laid in Helsinki” under the United Nations.
Many mainstream analysts see the New World Order as a term to describe the uniting of the world’s superpowers to secure and maintain global peace, safety and security. But a growing number of fringe analysts see a sinister motive and tie it to the elite’s quest for global dominance and a world government. Skeptics scoff that this as a mere conspiracy theory.
Pointing to comments by Rockefeller and other globalists, fringe analysts say in its broader sense, the New World Order is really more of an agenda by a group of international elites that control and manipulate governments, industry, and media organizations worldwide.
They maintain that in 1993, the New World Order was established as a legitimate agenda by President Bill Clinton, a socialist Democrat. “Both Bush and Clinton were beholding to the same secret orders, codes and financiers,” insist the fringe analysts, making it sound like a sub-plot from a Robert Ludlum thriller.
“In our post-2012 world,” writes Richard Moore, “we have for the first time one centralized global government, and one ruling elite clique, a kind of extended royal family, the lords of finance.”
So as Botswana looks forward, and begins the mind games, the second-guessing, and as the BDP and political opposition start the posturing in earnest ahead of 2014, take heed of the fears of these fringe analysts.
As they see it, the global financial crisis, the possibility of an even bleaker crisis as the effects of the United States debt overhang hits the world hard, as the end of the dollar era looms, as civil unrest and turmoil whips round the world, events are shaping up for the globalists to have their day. Watch this space.
