Judicial Reforms should move swiftly ahead; with or without the Constitutional Court

If there is one thing that the nation has got to thank both Ian Khama and Mokgweetsi Masisi for, it is the fact that the two men stretched the country’s administrative systems to the limits.

Not only were systems exposed, in the end they failed the stress test.

Khama went for the media freedoms, civil rights and civil liberties. Masisi went for the judiciary – the custodian of all liberties.

Privacy was compromised. Surveillance went full force.

Their means and ways slightly differed.

The effects were the same. The life of the nation came under attack.

For seventeen odd years the nation lived through artificially overheated times.

In both instances the two men’s weapon of choice was the intelligence and security services agency.

They weaponised it.

There's more to this story

But to keep reading, we need you to subscribe.

Investigative journalism is an indispensable part of a healthy society, but it's also expensive to produce. We are reliant on subscriptions to fund our work, and while you can enjoy most of our stories for free, a small number of premium features are reserved for subscribers.

You can subscribe for one week, a month or a full year - the choice is yours.

Save 77% on an annual subscription. Click here to find out how.

Existing subscribers can log in to keep reading here.

RELATED STORIES

Read this week's paper